您的位置: 首页 » 法律资料网 » 法律法规 »

SECURITIES (CLEARING HOUSES) ORDINANCE

时间:2024-07-09 14:43:15 来源: 法律资料网 作者:法律资料网 阅读:9430
下载地址: 点击此处下载

SECURITIES (CLEARING HOUSES) ORDINANCE ——附加英文版

Hong Kong


SECURITIES (CLEARING HOUSES) ORDINANCE
 (CHAPTER 420)
 CONTENTS
  
  ion
  I    PRELIMINARY
  hort title
  nterpretation
  II    DECLARATION OF CLEARING HOUSES FOR PURPOSES OF THIS
  NANCE AND RULES OF CLEARING HOUSES
  ecognized clearing houses
  ules of recognized clearing houses, etc.
  III   MODIFICATIONS OF THE LAW OF INSOLVENCY TO SAFEGUARD
  ATIONS AND PROCEDURES OF RECOGNIZED CLEARING HOUSES, ETC.
  roceedings of recognized clearing house take precedence over law
of
  lvency
  upplementary provisions as to default proceedings
  uty to report on completion of default proceedings
  et sum payable on completion of default proceedings
  isclaimer of property, rescission of contracts, etc.
  Adjustment of prior transactions
  Right of relevant office-holder to recover certain amounts
arising
  certain transactions
  Application of market collateral not affected by certain other
  rests, etc.
  Enforcement of judgments over property subject to market charge,
etc.
  Law of insolvency in other jurisdictions
  IV    MISCELLANEOUS
  Participant to be party to certain transactions as principal
  Securities deposited with recognized clearing house
  Immunity, etc.
  Preservation of rights, etc.
  Amendment of Schedules 1 and 2
  (Omitted as spent)
  Transitional
  dule 1 Property which may be subject to a market charge or provided
as
  et collateral
  dule 2 Requirements for default rules of recognized clearing 
houses
  dule 3 (Omitted as spent)
 Whole document:
  
  rdinance to empower the Commission to declare clearing houses 
to be
  gnized clearing houses for the purposes of this Ordinance, to 
provide
  the approval by the Commission of the rules of recognized 
clearing
  es, to make provision for safeguarding the operations and 
procedures
  ecognized clearing houses, and to provide for matters 
incidental
  eto or connected therewith.
  ctober 1992] L. N. 324 of 1992
 PART I PRELIMINARY
  
  hort title
  This Ordinance may be cited as the Securities (Clearing 
Houses)
  nance.
  (Omitted as spent)
  nterpretation
  In this Ordinance, unless the context otherwise requires--
  rge" means any form of security, including a mortgage;
  aring house" means a person--
  whose activities or objects include the provision of services for 
the
  ring and settlement of transactions in securities effected 
on, or
  ect to the rules of, the Unified Exchange; or
  who guarantees the settlement of any such transactions;
  mission" means the Securities and Futures Commission 
established by
  ion 3 of the Securities and Futures Commission Ordinance (Cap.
24);
  stitution", in relation to a clearing house, means the memorandum 
and
  cles of association of the clearing house;
  ault proceedings" means any proceedings or other action taken 
by a
  gnized clearing house under its default rules;
  ault rules", in relation to a recognized clearing house, means
such of
  rules of the clearing house which it is required to have by virtue 
of
  ion 4 (2);
  aulter" means a participant who is the subject of any 
default
  eedings; "functions" includes duties and powers;
  ket charge" means a charge, whether fixed or floating, 
granted in
  ur of a recognized clearing house--
  over any property specified in Schedule 1 which is held 
by or
  sited with the clearing house; and
  for the purpose of securing liabilities arising directly in
connection
  the clearing house's ensuring the settlement of one or more 
market
  racts; "market collateral" means any property specified in
Schedule 1
  h is held by or deposited with a recognized clearing house for 
the
  ose of securing liabilities arising directly in connection 
with the
  ring house's ensuring the settlement of one or more market
contracts;
  ket contract" means a contract subject to the rules of a 
recognized
  ring house entered into by the clearing house with a 
participant
  uant to a novation which is both in accordance with those rules 
and
  the purposes of the clearing and settlement of 
transactions in
  rities effected on, or subject to the rules of, the Unified
Exchange;
  icer" means an officer within the meaning of section 2 
of the
  anies Ordinance (Cap. 32);
  ticipant" means a person who, in accordance with the rules 
of a
  gnized clearing house, may participate in one or more of the 
services
  ided by the clearing house in its capacity as a clearing house;
  formance", in relation to a function, includes discharge and
exercise;
  ognized clearing house" means a clearing house declared under 
section
  ) to be a recognized clearing house for the purposes 
of this
  nance;
  
  evant office-holder" means--
  the Official Receiver appointed under section 75 of the 
Bankruptcy
  nance (Cap. 6);
  any person acting in relation to a company as its 
liquidator,
  isional liquidator, receiver or manager;
  any person acting in relation to an individual as his 
trustee in
  ruptcy or interim receiver of his property; or
  any person appointed pursuant to an order for the 
administration in
  ruptcy of an insolvent estate of a deceased person;
  es", in relation to a clearing house--
  means the constitution, rules, regulations or directions, by 
whatever
  called, governing the membership, management, 
operations  and
  edures of the clearing house; and
  without restricting the generality of paragraph (a), includes 
rules,
  lations or directions relating to--
  the provision of clearing and settlement services, and the 
suspension
  ithdrawal of such services;
  the provision of services other than the services referred 
to in
  aragraph (i);
  ) the persons who may participate in one or more of the 
services
  rred to in subparagraphs (i) and (ii); and
  setting and levying fees and charges;
  urities" means securities within the meaning of section 2 
of the
  rities Ordinance (Cap. 333);
  tlement", in relation to a market contract,  includes 
partial
  lement; "Unified Exchange" means the Unified Exchange 
established
  r section 27 of the Stock Exchanges Unification Ordinance (Cap.
361).
  Where--
  a charge is granted partly for the purpose specified in the
definition
  market charge" and partly for other purposes, the charge is in 
this
  nance a market charge in so far as it has effect for that 
specified
  ose;
  collateral is provided partly for the purpose specified 
in the
  nition of "market collateral" and partly for other 
purposes, the
  ateral is in this Ordinance market collateral in so far as it has
been
  ided for that specified purpose.
  References in this Ordinance to the law of insolvency 
include
  rences to every provision made by or under--
  the Bankruptcy Ordinance (Cap. 6);
  the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32); and
  any other enactment which is concerned with or in any way related 
to
  insolvency of a person.
  References in this Ordinance to settlement in relation to a 
market
  ract are to the discharge of the rights and liabilities of the
parties
  he contract, whether by performance, compromise or otherwise.
 PART II DECLARATION OF CLEARING HOUSES FOR PURPOSES OF THIS ORDI- 
NANCE AND RULES OF CLEARING HOUSES
  
  ecognized clearing houses
  Where the Commission is satisfied that it is appropriate to do 
so in
  interest of the investing public or in the public interest, or
for the
  er regulation of services for the clearing and 
settlement  of
  sactions in securities, it may, with the consent in writing 
of the
  ncial Secretary, by notice in the Gazette, declare a clearing
house to
  recognized clearing house for the purposes of this Ordinance.
  Where the Commission makes a declaration under subsection 
(1) in
  ect of a clearing house--
  it shall give notice thereof in writing to the clearing house;
and
  the rules of the clearing house in operation immediately 
before the
  aration shall continue to have effect unless otherwise 
specified, or
  l such time as is specified, in the notice referred to in paragraph
  
  ules of recognized clearing houses, etc.
  Subject to section 3 (2) (b) and subsection (4), no rules 
of a
  gnized clearing house (including any default rules of the 
clearing
  e) or any amendment thereto shall have effect unless 
approved in
  ing by the Commission.
  A recognized clearing house shall have rules which provide 
for the
  ng of proceedings or other action in the event of a 
participant
  aring to be unable, or likely to become unable, to 
meet his
  gations in respect of all unsettled market contracts to which he
is a
  y, and such rules shall comply with the requirements of Schedule
2.
  Where a recognized clearing house takes any default proceedings, 
all
  equent proceedings or other action taken under its rules 
for the
  oses of the settlement of market contracts of which the 
defaulter
  erned is a party shall be treated as done under the default rules 
of
  clearing house notwithstanding that, but for this subsection, 
such
  equent proceedings or other action would not be treated as done 
under
  default rules of the clearing house.
  The Commission may, by notice in the Gazette, declare any 
class of
  s of a recognized clearing house (except any default rules 
of the
  ring house) to be a class of rules which are not required 
to be
  oved under subsection (1) and, accordingly, any rules of that
clearing
  e which belong to that class (including any amendment thereto) 
shall
  effect notwithstanding that they have not been so approved.
  Without prejudice to the operation of subsection (4), a 
recognized
  ring house shall submit or cause to be submitted to the 
Commission,
  the information of the Commission, any of its rules 
(including any
  dment thereto )--
  which belong to a class of rules the subject of a declaration 
under
  ection (4); and
  as soon as practicable after those rules (or amendment thereto,
as the
  may be) are made.
  A recognized clearing house shall submit or cause to be 
submitted to
  Commission for its approval the rules of the clearing house and 
every
  dment thereto except any rules (including any amendment thereto)
which
  ng to a class of rules the subject of a declaration under
subsection
  
  
  Subject to subsections (8) and (9), the Commission shall, 
within 6
  s after the receipt of any submission under subsection (6) 
from a
  gnized clearing house, give notice in writing to the clearing 
house
  
  its approval of; or
  its refusal to approve,
  rules or amendment of the rules, as the case may be, or any 
part
  eof, the subject of the submission.
  The Commission may, in a particular case, with the agreement of 
the
  gnized clearing house concerned, extend the time 
prescribed in
  ection (7).
  The Financial Secretary may, on the advice of the 
Commission and
  er generally or in a particular case, extend the time 
prescribed in
  ection (7).
  The Commission may request in writing a recognized clearing
house--
  to make rules--
  specified in the request; and
  within the period specified in the request; or
  to amend rules--
  referred to in the request;
  in the manner specified in the request; and
  ) within the period specified in the request.
  Where the Commission is satisfied that a recognized clearing 
house
  not complied with a request referred to in subsection (10) within 
the
  od specified in the request, the Commission may direct in writing 
the
  ring house to comply with the request within such further period
as is
  ified in the direction and, accordingly, the clearing house 
shall
  ly with that request within that further period.
  For the purposes of subsection (10), "rules", in relation 
to a
  gnized clearing house, do not include the constitution of the
clearing
  e.
 PART III MODIFICATIONS OF THE LAW OF INSOLVENCY TO SAFEGUARD OPE- 
RATIONS AND PROCEDURES OF RECOGNIZED CLEARING HOUSES, ETC.
  
  roceedings of recognized clearing house take precedence over 
law of
  lvency
  None of the following shall be regarded as to any extent 
invalid at
  on the ground of inconsistency with the law relating 
to the
  ribution of the assets of a person on insolvency, 
bankruptcy or
  ing-up, or on the appointment of a receiver over any of the assets 
of
  rson--
  a market contract;
  the rules of a recognized clearing house relating to the
settlement of
  rket contract;
  any proceedings or other action taken under the rules of a 
recognized
  ring house relating to the settlement of a market contract;
  a market charge;
  the default rules of a recognized clearing house; or
  any default proceedings.
  Subject to subsection (3), the powers of a relevant office-
holder in
  capacity as such, and the powers of a court under the 
law of
  lvency, shall not be exercised in such a way as to 
prevent or
  rfere with--
  the settlement in accordance with the rules of a recognized 
clearing
  e of a market contract; or
  any default proceedings.
  Subsection (2) shall not operate to prevent a relevant 
office-holder
  seeking to recover any amount under section 11 after the 
completion
  matter referred to in paragraph (a) or (b) of that subsection.
  
  upplementary provisions as to default proceedings
  A court may on an application by a relevant office-holder make 
such
  r as it thinks fit altering or releasing him from compliance with
such
  he functions of his office as are affected by the fact that 
default
  eedings are pending or could be taken, or have been or could have
been
  n and, accordingly, such functions of the relevant officeholder 
shall
  onstrued subject to such order.
  Nothing in--
  section 12, 14 or 20 of the Bankruptcy Ordinance (Cap. 6); or
  section 166, 181, 183, 186 or 254 of the Companies Ordinance 
(Cap.
  shall prevent or interfere with any default proceedings.
  uty to report on completion of default proceedings
  A recognized clearing house shall, upon the completion by it of 
any
  ult proceedings, make a report on such proceedings stating in 
respect
  ach defaulter--
  the net sum, if any, certified by the clearing house to be payable 
by
  o the defaulter; or
  the fact that no sum is so payable,
  he case may be, and the clearing house may include in that report
such
  r particulars in respect of such proceedings as it thinks fit.
  A recognized clearing house which has made a report 
pursuant to
  ection (1) shall supply the report to--
  the Commission;
  any relevant office-holder acting in relation to--
  the defaulter to whom the report relates; or
  that defaulter's estate;
  if there is no relevant office-holder referred to in paragraph 
(b),
  defaulter to whom the report relates.
  Where the Commission receives pursuant to subsection (2) a report
made
  uant to subsection (1), it may publish notice of that fact in 
such
  er as it thinks appropriate to bring it to the attention of 
creditors
  he defaulter to whom the report relates.
  Where a relevant office-holder or defaulter receives 
pursuant to
  ection (2) a report made pursuant to subsection (1), he shall,
at the
  est of a creditor of the defaulter to whom the report relates--
  make the report available for inspection by the creditor;
  on payment of such reasonable fee as the relevant office-
holder or
  ulter, as the case may be, determines, supply to the creditor all 
or
  part of that report.
  In subsections (2), (3) and (4), "report" includes a copy of a
report.
  
  et sum payable on completion of default proceedings
  The provisions of this section shall apply with respect to any
net sum
  ified under section 7 (1) (a) by a recognized clearing house, upon
the
  letion by it of any default proceedings, to be payable by or 
to a
  ulter.
  Where a receiving or winding-up order has been made, or a 
resolution
  voluntary winding-up has been  passed,  any  net  sum 
shall,
  ithstanding any of the provisions of section 34 or 35 
of the
  ruptcy Ordinance (Cap. 6) or section 264 of the Companies
Ordinance
  . 32), be--
  provable in the bankruptcy or winding-up or, as the case 
may be,
  ble to the relevant office-holder; and
  taken into account, where appropriate, under section 35 
of the
  ruptcy Ordinance (Cap. 6) or that section as applied in the case
of a
  ing-up order under the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32).
  isclaimer of property, rescission of contracts, etc.
  Neither section 59 of the Bankruptcy Ordinance (Cap. 6) nor 
section
  of the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) shall apply in relation to--
  a market contract;
  a contract effected by a recognized clearing house for the purpose 
of
  izing property provided as market collateral;
  a market charge; or
  any default proceedings.
  Neither section 42 of the Bankruptcy Ordinance (Cap. 6) nor 
section
  of the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) shall apply in relation to 
any
  matter or thing which has been done pursuant to--
  a market contract;
  a disposition of property pursuant to a market contract;
  the provision of market collateral;
  a contract effected by a recognized clearing house for the purpose 
of
  izing property provided as market collateral, or any 
disposition of
  erty pursuant to such a contract;
  a disposition of property in accordance with the rules of a
recognized
  ring house as to the application of property provided as 
market
  ateral;

不分页显示   总共2页  1 [2]

  下一页

州人民政府办公室关于印发黔西南州州级金融机构支持地方经济社会发展考核奖惩暂行办法和黔西南州州级保险机构支持地方经济发展考核奖惩暂行办法的通知

贵州省黔西南布依族苗族自治州人民政府办公室


州人民政府办公室关于印发黔西南州州级金融机构支持地方经济社会发展考核奖惩暂行办法和黔西南州州级保险机构支持地方经济发展考核奖惩暂行办法的通知

州府办发〔2011〕38号


各县、市人民政府,州政府各部门、各直属机构,州级各金融机构、保险机构,顶效开发区管委会:
  《黔西南州州级金融机构支持地方经济社会发展考核奖惩暂行办法》和《黔西南州州级保险机构支持地方经济发展考核奖惩暂行办法》已经州人民政府研究同意,现印发给你们,请认真抓好落实。
  
  
           二〇一一年五月六日


黔西南州州级金融机构支持地方经济社会发展考核奖惩暂行办法

第一章 总 则

  第一条 为鼓励黔西南州州级金融机构积极扩大有效信贷投放,优化信贷结构,防范和化解金融风险,提高金融服务水平,促进地方经济社会发展,特制定《黔西南州州级金融机构支持地方经济社会发展考核奖惩暂行办法》(以下简称《暂行办法》)。
  第二条 本《暂行办法》考核对象为州级金融机构。
  第三条 本《暂行办法》所指贷款是指州级金融机构对黔西南州内发放的贷款。贷款净增额中要考虑不良贷款核销、剥离等因素。

第二章 考核机构及程序

  第四条 考核坚持“公开、公平、公正”的原则,由州政府金融办公室负责组织实施。
  第五条 各州级金融机构在年后20日内向州人民银行报送当年新增有效信贷投入状况表及有关资料,经州人民银行审核后报州政府金融办公室,作为考核依据。

第三章 考核指标设置

  第六条 考核各州级金融机构当年有效信贷投入等情况,实行量化考核。总分100分。
  第七条 贷款增量(20分)。考核当年贷款增量占全州贷款增量的比重,以当年全州贷款增量总额,测算各州级金融机构贷款增量所占比重,按其占比计算得分。
  第八条 贷款增速(10分)。州级金融机构贷款增量达2亿元以上(低于2亿元的不得分)的,以贷款增速计算得分,贷款增速最高的10分,贷款增速排名每名次相差0.5分。
  第九条 新增存款用于当地贷款(10分)。各州级金融机构新增存款60%以上用于当地贷款的得5分(低于60%的不得分),增量存贷比80%以上或存量存贷比70%以上的10分,其余机构按存量存贷比计算得分,每名次相差0.5分。
  第十条 积极支持州重点项目(20分)。各州级金融机构当年对州重点项目给予信贷支持,以当年全州重点项目新增贷款总额,测算各州级金融机构的贷款占比,按其占比计算得分。州重点项目名单由州政府金融办公室提供。
  第十一条 积极支持“三农”、中小企业(20分)。各州级金融机构当年对“三农”、中小企业贷款余额低于上年同期水平不得分。对符合条件的州级金融机构,以当年“三农”、中小企业增加贷款总额,测算各州级金融机构贷款增量占比,按贷款占比计算得分。
  第十二条 金融创新(5分)。各州级金融机构利用银行间债券市场平台,主动协调、帮助企业进行直接融资以及各州级金融机构当年信贷产品创新并取得良好效果。
  第十三条 信贷政策导向效果评估(5分)。按当年各州级金融机构信贷政策导向效果评估结果,由州人民银行考核评分。
  第十四条 完善金融服务网点(5分)。各州级金融机构积极加强金融服务,新增机构或营业网点,由州银监局考核评分。
  第十五条 完成州委、州政府交办的重大工作任务的加10分。

第四章 表彰与奖惩

  第十六条 考核奖励资金列入州级财政预算。
  第十七条 州政府金融办公室根据考核结果设置一、二、三名。对州人民银行、州银监局的考核奖励,由州政府金融办公室根据其当年工作成绩进行综合评定后给予奖励。
  第十八条 对考核结果排后三名的州级金融机构,州政府金融办公室进行通报批评。对排最后一名的,将其考核结果通报其上级部门,并在下一年度降低其10%的政府性存款。
  第十九条 考核结果经州委常委会、州政府常务会议研究后执行。
  第二十条 奖励资金20%用于获奖单位的主要领导和班子成员,其余奖励资金由获奖单位自行安排。

第五章 附 则

  第二十一条 本《暂行办法》由州政府金融办公室负责解释。
  第二十二条 本《暂行办法》自发布之日起施行。



黔西南州州级保险机构支持地方经济社会发展考核奖惩暂行办法

第一章 总 则

  第一条 为认真贯彻落实国务院《关于保险业改革发展的若干意见》,积极引入保险机制参与社会管理,鼓励保险机构支持地方经济社会发展,进一步提高保险业整体服务水平,充分发挥保险的经济“助推器”和社会“稳定器”作用,为黔西南州经济社会发展提供多层次、全方位的保险保障,促进社会和谐,特制定《黔西南州州级保险机构支持地方经济社会发展考核奖惩暂行办法》(以下简称《暂行办法》)。
  第二条 本《暂行办法》考核对象为州级保险机构。

第二章 考核机构及程序

  第三条 考核坚持“公开、公平、公正”的原则,由州政府金融办公室负责组织实施。
  第四条 各州级保险机构在年后20日内向州保险协会报送有关资料,经州保险协会审核后报州政府金融办公室,作为考核依据。

第三章 考核指标设置

  第五条 考核各州级保险机构当年支持地方经济社会发展情况,主要考核保险机构当年赔付总额和赔付率,实行量化考核,总分100分。
  第六条 保险机构当年赔付总额和赔付率(40分)。财产保险类公司考核所有赔款,人寿保险类公司考核意外伤害保险赔款和人身险赔款。
  赔付总额(25分):高于当年全州保险行业平均增长幅度且高于本公司上年赔付总额的得25分,高于当年全州保险行业平均增幅但低于本公司上年赔付总额的得15分,低于全州保险行业平均增幅但高于上年本公司赔付总额的得10分,低于全州保险行业平均增幅且低于上年本公司赔付总额的不得分。
  赔付率(15分):高于当年全州保险行业平均赔付率的得15分,低于当年全州保险行业平均赔付率但高于本公司上年赔付率的得5分,低于当年全州保险行业平均赔付率又低于本公司上年赔付率的不得分。
  第七条 积极支持“三农”,为农村提供保险服务(20分)。各州级保险机构当年对“三农”的保险服务,财产保险类的保险机构要积极做好森林保险、农房保险、能繁母猪保险、能繁母羊保险、奶牛保险、种植业保险、农用拖拉机保险等工作,人寿保险类的保险机构要积极做好农村小额人身意外保险、学生意外伤害及住院医疗保险、新农合医疗保险(委托)、新农合养老保险(委托)等工作,按保费占比评分,最高20分,按占比排名,每名次相差1分。
  第八条 积极支持重点项目(15分)。各州级保险机构当年对州重点项目给予保险保障支持,以当年服务重点项目保费收入总额,测算各州级保险机构的保费占比,按其占比计算得分,最高15分,每名次相差1分。州重点项目名单由州政府金融办公室提供。
  第九条 保险创新(10分)。各州级保险机构当年保险产品创新取得良好效果;主动协调,帮助企业进行年金管理,办理补充保险等。
  第十条 完善保险服务网点(10分)。各州级保险机构积极强化服务,新增机构或营业网点,由州保险行业协会考核评分。
  第十一条 诚信服务效果评估(5分)。获省级“重合同、守信用”单位的得5分;获州级“重合同、守信用”单位的得3分。
  第十二条 完成州委、州政府交办的重大任务的加10分。

第四章 表彰与奖惩

  第十三条 考核奖励资金列入州级财政预算。
  第十四条 考核结果设置一、二、三名。
  第十五条 考核结果经州委常委会、州政府常务会议研究后执行。
  第十六条 奖励资金20%用于获奖单位的主要领导和班子成员,其余奖励资金由获奖单位自行安排。

第五章 附 则

  第十七条 本《暂行办法》由州政府金融办公室负责解释。
  第十八条 本《暂行办法》自发布之日起施行。
  
 
  



互联网域名争议解决机制之我见

焦保宏


域名是互联网络上识别和定位计算机的层次结构式的字符标识。作为一种稀缺和有限的资源,在电子商务日益发展的今天,域名与受法律保护的权益(如商标等)之间的争议已经引起人们的广泛关注。笔者在此想通过自己代理域名争议案件的体会谈一谈对我国目前的域名争议解决机制的一些理解。
为解决这一问题,因特网IP地址和域名管理机构(ICANN)于1999年10月正式推出了《统一域名争议解决办法》及其实施规则,并于1999年授权世界知识产权组织仲裁与调解中心启动了域名争议行政解决程序。2000年7月24日制订了《世界知识产权组织统一域名争议解决办法补充规则》及《统一域名争议解决办法程序规则》。
一、我国域名争议解决机制概况
在我国,中国互联网络信息中心(CNNIC)也考虑建立一套有中国特色的域名争议解决制度。中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会域名争议解决中心于2000年底由中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会组建成立,并于2005年7月5日启用“中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会网上争议解决中心”(下称“解决中心”)名称,作为中国互联网络信息中心(CNNIC)授权的争议解决机构,依据中国互联网络信息中心2002年9月30日发布实施的《中国互联网络信息中心域名争议解决办法》(下称“《解决办法》”)、《中国互联网信息中心域名争议解决程序规则》及《中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会关于〈中国互联网信息中心域名争议解决办法〉补充规则》解决.CN和中文域名争议。
在司法程序方面,最高人民法院也制订了《关于审理涉及计算机网络域名民事纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的解释》(下称“《解释》”),于2001年7月24日起施行,作为司法程序解决域名争议的主要依据。2004年12月20日起施行的《中国互联网络域名管理办法》(下称“《管理办法》”)是我国目前对域名管理立法中最权威的部门规章,其对域名争议的解决作了原则性规定。
二、域名争议解决程序的法律属性
在中国,大多数人习惯了去法院或传统仲裁机构解决纷争,民间的调解组织至今未能获得明确的法律地位。域名争议解决程序的法律属性在我国立法中是明确的,《管理办法》第三十八条规定:“域名争议解决机构作出的裁决只涉及争议域名持有者信息的变更。域名争议解决机构作出的裁决与人民法院或者仲裁机构已经发生法律效力的裁判不一致的,域名争议解决机构的裁决服从于人民法院或者仲裁机构发生法律效力的裁判。”不仅如此,在依据《解决办法》提出投诉之前,争议解决程序进行中,或者专家组作出裁决后,投诉人或者被投诉人均可以就同一争议向有管辖权的中国法院提起诉讼,或者基于协议提请中国仲裁机构仲裁。
而且,“解决中心”裁决注销域名或者裁决将域名转移给投诉人的,自裁决公布之日起满10日的,域名注册服务机构予以执行。但被投诉人自裁决公布之日起10日内提供有效证据证明有管辖权的司法机关或者仲裁机构已经受理相关争议的,争议解决机构的裁决暂停执行。对于暂停执行的争议解决机构的裁决,域名注册服务机构视情况作如下处理:(一)有证
据表明,争议双方已经达成和解的,执行和解协议;(二)有证据表明,有关起诉或者仲裁申请已经被驳回或者撤回的,执行争议解决机构的裁决;(三)有关司法机关或者仲裁机构作出裁判,且已发生法律效力的,执行该裁判。
显而易见,“解决中心”的域名争议解决程序并不具有司法程序所产生的法律效力,当其裁决与司法机关或传统仲裁机构所做的裁决冲突时,也不具有任何法律效力。其仅仅作为CNNIC为了快速解决域名争议而设置的一种“变通”的解决程序存在。
三、我国域名争议解决机制的特点
目前,我国的域名争议解决机制包括司法程序和依《解决办法》形成的解决机制各自具有不同的特色。
管辖原则
依照国际通行的惯例,我国对域名注册采取“先申请先注册”原则,而《解决办法》构成域名持有人与域名注册服务机构之间的域名注册协议的一部分,对域名持有人具有约束力。如果其申请注册的域名侵犯了他人的在先合法权益(如商标权),该权利所有人向域名注册管理机构CNNIC授权的域名争议解决机构提出投诉,则域名注册人必须接受域名注册管理机构所设定的域名争议解决机制和其授权的域名争议解决机构的管辖,参与争议解决程序。域名注册人通常没有权利修改域名注册协议的条款,必须接受域名注册管理机构所设定的域名争议解决机制的管辖,因此,“解决中心”在管辖权上具有一定的强制性。
而《解释》所规定的“由侵权行为地或者被告住所地的中级人民法院管辖。对难以确定侵权行为地和被告住所地的,原告发现该域名的计算机终端等设备所在地可以视为侵权行为地。”这一规定使当事人在选择受诉法院时经常产生困惑。其实,通过域名注册服务机构的网站查询域名的Whois信息,即可获得域名持有人的全部注册资料,并不会存在“难以确定侵权行为地和被告住所地”的情形。
审理期限
提交“解决中心”仲裁的投诉,除非专家组认为有必要举行当庭听证,争议解决机构将在专家组成立之日起14日内对争议做出裁决,而普通程序的民事诉讼或传统仲裁则最长需要6个月才能作出裁决。另外,由于裁决只涉及到域名持有者信息的变更,不涉及到赔偿等复杂的问题,按照争议解决规则的规定,从投诉提交到仲裁完成一般不超过两个月。快速的在线裁决系统的使用,通过电子邮件等方式传递投诉书、答辩书、证据和裁决书,也免除了当事人往返奔波,减少了解决域名争议的成本。
举证规则
《解决办法》虽同样规定“投诉人和被投诉人应当对各自的主张承担举证责任”,但在实践中,由于域名争议解决是一种快速的纠纷处理程序,在案件证据的采信和事实的认定上,凡当事人提交并已转递对方的证据,在对方当事人不予质疑或否认的情况下,专家组将予以采信。如果对方当事人质疑或否认有关证据的真实性,专家组将在全面衡量所涉证据和当事人的理由的基础上就此独立作出认定。在这点上,与民事诉讼的证据规则规定的“未经质证的证据,不能作为认定案件事实的依据”相比较,则显得更有效率。
审理依据
作为我国互联网域名注册管理权威机构,CNNIC对任何一种新生域名或网址访问体系都必然配套出台新的管理办法和争议解决办法。这点上司法解释和立法相对滞后的不足就显的很明显。譬如在《解释》出台后不久,“通用网址”出现了,这是一种新型快速访问网址技术,通过建立通用网址和域名(URL)之间的对应关系实现访问。经CNNIC授权,“解决中心”依据中国互联网络信息中心2001年8月4日发布实施的《中国互联网络信息中心通用网址争议解决办法》以及2002年1月1日生效实施的《中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会通用网址争议解决程序规则》,解决中国互联网络信息中心负责管理和维护的通用网址争议。其中具体的规定并不是《解释》所能预期和涵盖的,那么,对于日益增加的通用网址争议的解决能否适用《解释》的规定审理和裁决,笔者认为是不能适用的。因为,通用网址与域名是完全不同的两个体系。
中立性
域名争议机构聘请的专家均是法律界的权威人士和网络域名方面的专家,先进的在线裁决系统主要通过电子邮件、邮寄方式传递文书,这使得专家组成员不与当事人及代理人直接接触,使他们在裁决案件时很少会受到案件外的因素的影响,一般能保证裁决的公正性。
裁决的执行
一旦当事人双方接受了域名争议解决机构启动争议解决程序,那么专家组将在短期内作出裁决,而该裁决只需等待10日,以便不服该裁决的当事人有机会提起司法救济程序,否则,该项裁决将由域名注册机构付诸执行。尽管这仍不中以阻碍当事人继续向法院或传统仲裁机构主张权利,但只要该裁决不与法院或传统仲裁机构的裁决相冲突,那么,效力仍然是不能被否定的。
诉求的限制
《解决办法》第十三条规定,在认定投诉人的投诉成立的前提下,争议解决机构对注册域名的处理结果应仅限于:(一)注销已经注册的域名;(二)将注册域名转移给投诉人。除此之外,商标权人要想获得其他救济,如金钱方面的救济,或者针对域名持有人的禁止性裁判,只能诉诸司法程序。《解释》规定“人民法院认定域名注册、使用等行为构成侵权或者不正当竞争的,可以判令被告停止侵权、注销域名,或者依原告的请求判令由原告注册使用该域名;给权利人造成实际损害的,可以判令被告赔偿损失。”也正是由于《解释》将争议直接定性为“侵权或不正当竞争”,因而投诉人提出经济赔偿的要求也就显得理所当然。
四、域名争议解决机制的核心规则及存在的问题
(一)、投诉成立的条件
为了使投诉主张获得支持,投诉人必须举证证明以下事项同时存在,缺一不可:
第一、被投诉的域名与投诉人享有民事权益的名称或者标志相同,具有足以导致混淆的近似性。《解释》第四条规定为“(一)原告请求保护的民事权益合法有效;(二)被告域名或其主要部分构成对原告驰名商标的复制、模仿、翻译或音译;或者与原告的注册商标、域名等相同或近似,足以造成相关公众的误认。”
《解决办法》并未提及“商标”,而是统称为“享有民事权益的名称或者标志”,这一概念将受理争议的范围并不局限在域名与商标之间,也包括了域名和域名、域名和其他享有民事权益的标志之间的争议。这一点上《解决办法》与《解释》不谋而合。鉴于驰名商标的认定是一个十分敏感的问题,域名争议解决机构并未涉足其中,国家工商行政管理局于1996年8月颁布的《驰名商标认定和管理暂行办法》第三条规定:“国家工商行政管理局商标局负责驰名商标的认定与管理工作。任何组织和个人不得认定或者采取其他变相方式认定驰名商标。”但《解释》突破了这一限制,明确规定“人民法院审理域名纠纷案件,根据当事人的请求以及案件的具体情况,可以对涉及的注册商标是否驰名依法作出认定。”从这种突破可以看出,我国域名争议解决机制中实际上使域名持有人处于相对不利的地位。
第二、被投诉的域名持有人对域名或者其主要部分不享有合法权益。《解释》规定为“被告对该域名或其主要部分不享有权益,也无注册、使用该域名的正当理由”。
也就是说投诉人必须明确,只要域名持有人对被投诉的域名享有一定的权利,其所提出的投诉就必然被专家组驳回。但在这一问题上,要求投诉人举证证明被投诉人对所持有的域名并不享有合法权益是不实际的,只有被投诉人对其确实享有合法权益举证证明了。
第三、被投诉的域名持有人对域名的注册或者使用具有恶意。
“恶意”的存在与否是认定域名注册或使用非法的前提条件,也是域名持有人是否合理注册、使用的判断标准。
(二)、恶意的认定
由于“恶意”本身是一个没有明确界定的词语,因此,《解决办法》和《解释》都对何为“恶意”作出了列举式的规定。
(1)、《解决办法》第九条规定:注册或者受让域名是为了出售、出租或者以其他方式转让该域名,以获取不正当利益。《解释》规定为“曾要约高价出售、出租或者以其他方式转让该域名获取不正当利益的”。
客观地说,最高人民法院在制定《解释》时对该问题采取了更为审慎的态度。实际生活中,的确有域名持有人在注册域名后并不想继续使用,而需要出售或者出租给他人使用,做为一种以一定价格取得的并具有标记不同网址的功能的符号,其已经被越来越多的人认可为一种“财产”,在《域名管理办法》并未禁止性规定的情况下,其自由转让的行为是应该被许可的。因此,可以被认定为具有“恶意”的转让行为应当是由域名持有人以不合理的高价主动提出转让要约的情形。当然,笔者认为,为了审理时能够“有法可依”,应当对“高价”的标准作出界定。
(2)、《解决办法》规定“多次将他人享有合法权益的名称或者标志注册为自己的域名,以阻止他人以域名的形式在互联网上使用其享有合法权益的名称或者标志。”《解释》规定“注册域名后自己并不使用也未准备使用,而有意阻止权利人注册该域名的”。
由于域名注册暂行管理办法并未限制域名持有人同时注册多个域名,这样,域名的“闲置”现象便很正常。因此,并不能将注册后不使用的域名一概地认定为“恶意”注册的域名,关键在于是否“有意阻止权利人注册该域名”。
(3)、《解决办法》规定“注册或者受让域名是为了损害投诉人的声誉,破坏投诉人正常的业务活动,或者混淆与投诉人之间的区别,误导公众。”《解释》规定为“为商业目的注册、使用与原告的注册商标、域名等相同或近似的域名,故意造成与原告提供的产品、服务或者原告网站的混淆,误导网络用户访问其网站或其他在线站点的”。
(三)、域名持有人的抗辩
域名持有人的抗辩权,是证明被投诉人注册或使用域名并不存在恶意的依据所在,并且这些规定有利于维护域名注册制度的稳定,遏制权利人滥用域名争议解决机制。但《解决办法》对此却并未明确作出规定。最高人民法院的《解释》仅规定了“被告举证证明在纠纷发生前其所持有的域名已经获得一定的知名度,且能与原告的注册商标、域名等相区别,或者具有其他情形足以证明其不具有恶意的,人民法院可以不认定被告具有恶意。”